matt fig -凯发k8网页登录
5676
5676
rank4
4
badges805
805
score
matt fig received badge for on 30 jul 2013 |
matt fig submitted to on 21 jan 2013 |
matt fig submitted to on 21 aug 2012 |
matt fig submitted a to i see what you are trying to do, but there is an analytical solution for l. it seems you only have a problem with l, not p (as far as the test cases).
on 2 mar 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 2 mar 2012 |
|
|
matt fig submitted a to thanks gunther. the function does produce the correct graphic, but only when t(1)=0 as in my example.
on 16 feb 2012 |
matt fig submitted a to lol, bmtran! just trying to have a little fun with the format. indeed, it has been so long since i solved this kind of problem that i can only hope i didn't make a mistake that would show up in the test-suite!
on 16 feb 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 15 feb 2012 |
matt fig submitted a to i hate recursion, so it is all infernal to me! iteration is the way to go...
on 9 feb 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 9 feb 2012 |
matt fig submitted a to if you look at the example posted in the problem description, you will see that the return argument should be a two element row vector.
on 9 feb 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 8 feb 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 7 feb 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 7 feb 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 7 feb 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 7 feb 2012 |
matt fig submitted a to octogenarian, shmoctogenarian! hope that one didn't keep you up too late, roger. :-)
on 5 feb 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 5 feb 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 2 feb 2012 |
matt fig received badge for on 2 feb 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 1 feb 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 1 feb 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 31 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 31 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 31 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 31 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 31 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 31 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 31 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 31 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 31 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 31 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 31 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 31 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 30 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 30 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 30 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 30 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 30 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 30 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 30 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 30 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 30 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 30 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 30 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 30 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 30 jan 2012 |
matt fig submitted to on 30 jan 2012 |